Stargate Articles

[Puppy]

******* Edited To Insert Spoiler Space! *********
The following may contain spoilers for Stargate SG-1, if you're not up to date with the episodes that have screened in the US. If you're still watching on Australian TV you may not want to read the following!
(Sorry pups, only realised after you'd gone! )
******* Spoiler Space Follows! ***************







































Not Lost, But Gone Before...

Michael Shanks tells Thomasina Gibson the truth about why he's leaving Stargate SG-1

Not so long ago, a young scientist named Daniel Jackson managed to decipher a set of symbols, thereby allowing various explorers to visit new worlds, via a series of Stargates. Having travelled the universe for five years, as part of the illustrious SG-1 - the top team in anybody's solar system - the aforementioned archaeologist/anthropologist decided to turn in a different direction and left for pastures new. Who would have guessed that his brave action would cause so much trauma to so many individuals, not least the executives at MGM? Talk about being hit by a blast from a staff weapon!
Ever since Stargate SG-1's co-creator and executive producer Brad Wright, was forced to announce Michael Shanks' departure from the series during a Q&A panel at the Gatecon event in Vancouver, shockwaves have reverbrated round the entire Stargate SG-1 fan community. Dismay turned to anger in some quarters when comments made by the actor suggested that the decision to leave wasn't entirely voluntary but that editorial and conspiritorial circumstances precipitated his decision. Nothing, in this world, could have prepared MGM bosses for the deluge of correspondence via letters, emails, phone calls and adverts that has poured in from 'Danielites' expressing their views at the loss of 'their' Dr. Jackson.
In Starlog issue #21 we ran a letter from Stargate SG-1 fan Alison Butler regarding the controversy over Michael Shanks sudden departure. Alison felt so strongly about what she perceived to be a concentrated conspiracy to get rid of the character that she wrote to MGM, Starlog, and every other magazine on sale in the UK not once, but several times over to make her views known. She even started a website so that other supporters of the 'Save Daniel Jackson' campaign could rally to the cause. Alison's letter set the ball rolling and we recieved many others protesting in a similar vein.

Shanks A Lot

Somewhat surprised by the intensity of people's reactions, Michael Shanks had this to say: 'In terms of the big internet campaign and things like that, I think it's great. That said, it has also been a bit overwhelming. I mean, it's all been supportive and a lot of people I've talked with have been very sad about the character's death, which again is quite an ego boost. But really, it's just great to see that people feel strongly enough to do something about their feelings and I think they've gotten enough of both sides of the story - both mine and MGM's - to have enough information to take perspective on the whole situation.'
For the record, MGM has repeatedly stated that it supports Michael Shanks' decision to leave the series and that everyone at the company and Stargate Productions extends good wishes for his future. At no point has anyone intimated in any way that the Daniel character had to go. Speaking for Stargate productions, Brad Wright - who has been maligned as 'chief baddie' in the whole debacle, but who, in fact has been open and honest with fans from day one of production - did offer his opinion that: 'Daniel's arc[as it had been outlined in the original premise] was done.'
That's not to say that there were no more avenues to explore with the character, but, as Wright points out: 'Michael expressed a desire to move on; had made his feelings known for some time and we did our best to accommodate his wishes.'

Internet Frenzy

Seemingly dissatisfied with the response from anyone except Michael Shanks, an internet campaign sparked a wave of protest with pro-Daniel Jackson fans actually raising funds to place ads in various printed publications, including the prestigious Hollywood Variety and several UK magazines. Rowan from Washington State, in the US, explained her reasons for such a dramatic manoeuvre. 'I've been a fan of sci-fi television for a very long time and have seen many a campaign to save a show or save a particular character succeed because the powers that be are made aware of how much TV-watching time is invested because of that show or individual. Sometimes the executives of a particular network or corporation have no real idea of the impact of the production on people's lives. They kind of live in a vacuum and can often make decisions based on a lack of knowledge, rather than listening to and taking on board how those of us out here actually feel.
'With Sg-1, the main reasons we put the ads in the paper were two-fold. First, we wanted to show our support for the show in general and let anyone and everyone know that "We love Stargate SG-1." We're not advocating a boycott of the show or of the movie. This is not a kindergarten. We just want our show back to its original groundbreaking formula. All of the people who donated money to place the ads share the same view. SG-1 won't be SG-1 without Daniel. SG-1 is a team. Let's keep it that way. The second reason for the ads was to make it clear how dear Daniel Jackson is to our hearts and to thank Michael Shanks for sharing his talent with usfor five great years. He took that character and made it his own and we love him for it.'

Strong Support

While this very public outpouring of support has warmed the cockles of Michael Shanks' heart, the financial sums involved have caused him slight discomfort. 'You know, as an actor you can't help but go "Wow! That's very flattering!" However, though I don't know exactly how much it actually costs to place an ad in a publication, I know that it's likely to be a considerable amount and my feeling is that if money like that is being spent, I can't necessarily say I support that aspect of it. What I really wish is that it could be given to a more important cause than Michael Shanks and the character of Daniel Jackson. I just think there are more deserving causes out there to put a little money into than characters on a television show. So I really wish that wasn't happening.
As if the big internet and ad campaign wasn't enough, the strong physical demonstration of admiration toward Shanks has taken the actor completely by surprise. The five-minute standing ovation he received from 900 attendees at the SG-4 event in London reduced the man to tears. 'My eyes have been opened during this tour around the UK and other places. Doing the show for so long you become insulated in your ownl ittle world. You get information from the outside world as it's given to you from the corporation, so you get a sense of things. But until you actually get a chance to meet the people, you don't really get how strongly they feel about you.'
Shankss sense of gratitude and humility was brought to the fore by two letters from Emma-Jayne Tiller from Bristol and her mother, Maria. Emma-Jayne had been unaware of any spoilers sow was totally unprepared for Daniel's demise when she settled down to watch Meridian on Sky One. According to her mum, she cried well into the night, which would have been distressing in any event, but the Tillers had more than the usual reason to mourn Daniel's departure.
Faced with such a responsibility, Shanks could only shrug and offer a virtual hug to the pair. 'Something like this really tears your heart out and throws it on the floor. No matter what happens in this career - because it is based on fiction and sometimes the business can be a strange egocentric diversion from real life - no matter what you feel about yourself in that vein; if you can give hope to someone or divert some of the positive energy directed toward you to make someone else's day, then that is the true benefit of doing the kind of job I do. That's why I like the character of Daniel so much. There were things about him that we cherish in human nature and to hear what I did as Daniel and what SG-1 did together had such an impact on other human beings is really overwhelming.

Positive Thinking

Now although there has been much wailing, gnashing of teeth and threats to cease watching the show, almost as much shouting has come from those who applaud Michael Shanks' decision to venture into the blue yonder and look forward to what the future holds for the rest of the team who give the show it's name. There aren't any ads in print yet, but umpteen websites and chat lists have been set up so that those still loyal to Jack (Richard Dean Anderson), Sam (Amanda Tapping), Teal'c (Christopher Judge) can have their say and share their veiws with the programme-makers. Almost as many readers have written to Starlog and other magazines to share their excitement at the forthcoming season.
I consider myself a fan first and writer second and am in the privleged position of meeting with and getting to know the brilliant people who make Stargate SG-1 so I'd like to voulunteer my two-pence worth. First up, I'm not surprised in the least by the sheer volume of response from fans to Michael Shanks' departure. I've met literally thousands of people in person at events in the UK, Europe, Canada, the US and Australia, and have chatted to a fair few over the internet. There was never any doubt in my mind that a great many more individuals than expected would bombard the studio executives with their views. Personally, I offer the that great British phrase of encouragement - 'more power to their elbows' - but I choose to ad 'within reason'.

Team Spirit

Since this entire debacle started, I've seen and listened to various theories being bandied about regarding the perceived 'real' reasons behind Michael Shanks' departure and about the shameful way a new character has supposedly been slotted in to replace Daniel Jackson. I've watched two very distinct 'sides' slide into conflict over whether or not to watch the new last season of Stargate SG-1. However, both sides have reiterated that the show is put together but a team of great people just as the SG-1 characters form a great team.One of that team is now longer with us in the form we grew to love, but as the last few seconds of Revelations suggest - Daniel Jackson is not lost... just gone before.
Furthermore, the makers of the show have assured us that Daniel Jackson with be in further episodes of Stargate SG-1 if Michael Shanks is available. However, as much as I personally would like to see Daniel Jackson appear in Season Six, I too, fully support his desireto leave to explore new avenues. The man is talented, determined and his star is on the rise. I fully expect him to to be swamped with offers of work and look forward to seeing him shine. If Michael gets the opportunities all his fans wish for him, he won't be able to return to the Stargate SG-1 show. I will miss Daniel, but add my warmest wishes to those from everyone else who wish Michael well.
As for the new season, I can't wait. There's a brand-new bunch of stories and the opportunity to see the team members of SG-1 develop to their full potential. Thare are at least two new recurring characters that are set to give 'the kids' ar run for their money, and who are bound to add a certain frissom to the team dynamics. Five years ago, co-creator Brad Wright said: 'From the very beginning, our aim has been to incorporate new characters into the mix.' General Hammond (Don S. Davis) speaks for me: 'SG-1! You have a go.'

##########################3

Letters now ***

The Heart and Soul

Alison put it far more eloquently than I ever could, about how I feel as a fan of Stargate SG-1, with regard to the departure of Michael Shanks. Daniel Jackson is the 'heart and soul' (quote from Brad Wright executive producer) of SG-1, both as a single character and as a part of the team. Without him, as we've seen in far too many recent episodes in which his role has been diminished, Stargate looks like any other TV programme. It loses, for me at least, that magical spark that makes you look forward to each episode. When he leaves, so will I. S A Greenhalgh, Notts

A Truly Unique Character

I completely agree with Alison Butler. My favourite episodes are also the ones in which Daniel Jackson takes centre-stage, such as Holiday, Legacy, Crystal Skull, The First Ones, The Curse, Absolute Power and especially Forever in a Day. I may very well not watch Season Six or buy the DVD (I have all the ones released so far). Michael Shanks adds so much to the show. I'm sure that he will go on and achieve much in his career and Stargate SG-1 will be duller without his star quality. His character seems to unique in SF/fantasy, in questioning the morality and meaning of what the other characters do. I think the production team will be short-sighted not to get Michael Shanks back on board as soon as possible. Jennifer Robinson, Herts

Daniel Is Stargate

Stargate SG-1 without Daniel Jackson is just not on. How can the producers be so naive as to think that the final series will be acceptable to true fans with a new character. Daniel is Stargate. It was he that opened the gate, and it was he and Jack who led the first mission through it.
Since the death of his wife and a steering away from the mythical side of the storylines, there has been little for Daniel to do. However, with the introduction of Osiris and a new system lord, Anubis, there is plenty of scope for Daniel to resume his rightful place centrestage. In Season Four and Five, Daniel has been sidelined and underused, which is a mistake. Episodes in which he has not appeared always have the feeling that something is missing.
The relationship between Jack and Daniel still has many unresolved issues and many fans would like to see how the friendship which is developing between them grows. Jack once described Daniel as the voice and conscience of SG-1, but now the producers and writers want us to believer that the team will carry on 'business as usual' without him.
A new team member at this late stage is not a good move. The final series of this excellent show MUST be with the original team intact. To tell us that the door is open for Daniel to make guest appearances or be in a spin-off movie demonstrates that perhaps someone has realised that what a mistake it would be to let him go.
I do admire Michael Shanks' decision to quit rather than compromise Daniel's integrity. The production team must, however, have a rethink and find a way to satisfy Michael Shanks' very real concerns with the direction the show has taken and the impact it has had on Daniel's character. Every effort must be made to retain this fine actor in the show. We want no substitutes. We want Daniel Jackson back in the family where he belongs.
I just hope the powers that be will show some sense and that Stargate SG-1 goes out with a bang rather than a whimper. Lunar, Croydon

Thanks, But No Shanks

I was staggered to read Alison's letter regarding my favourite SF programme, Stargate SG-1. Whilst I like Michael Shanks, I would have have to say that the whole programme hinges on the relationship with Jack and Teal'c (Richard Dean Anderson and Christopher Judge). The interplay between all the characters is very strong and it's this that makes Stargate SG-1 better than any other SF programme.
I will be very sad to see Daniel Jackson's character leave (although he will return for the odd guest appearance), however, if either Jack of Teal'c were to go, I don't think the show would have the same humour and humanity.
Daniel is always a good guy, but Jack and Teal'c are more real. Jack gets cranky, hates scientists and makes tough decisions fast - he has also kept them all alive. Teal'c doesn't say much, but when he does Chris Judge wrings every bit of humour possible from the situation. He also has this 'revenge' thing. The buddy-buddy relationship is Jack and Teal'c - either one would be devastated if the other was lost.
I wish Michael Shanks well and look forward to him coming back to the show from time to time, but if Anderson left, I would stop watching the programme.
I also think that Amanda Tapping has created, in Sam Carter, a wonderful, strong and intelligent character. For once, here is a woman who doesn't go around scantily-clad in order to show off her figure. I hate all these American science-fiction shows featuring women who are really nothing but 'eye candy' to use the populist expression. Janeway, another potentially strong female character in Star Trek: Voyager, was often given to eyeing the camera with a 'sultry' look, trying to look sexy - yuk! So please give us more of Sam Carter and less of Seven of Nine (loved the character but hated the body).
It seems to me that SF programmed-makers have found a loyal market to tap into, but have decided to fill it with women who look like Barbie dolls and men who would be more at home modelling underpants than in outer space, while the writers fill their mouths with technobabble in an attempt to solve any problem with only minutes to spare. Sue Kennedy, South Wales

Stargate SG-1 Meridian. Starlog Verdict. 4 1/2 stars.

First Look

Writing the episode that sees one of a show's best-loved characters take his leave must be one of the hardest tasks a writer can undertake. Stargate SG-1's Robert C Cooper rose to the challenge admirably and produced 45 minutes of television that was truly exciting, thought-provoking and most importantly, a fitting farewell to the lovely Daniel Jackson (Michael Shanks).
From the first shocking couple of minutes where Daniel races to the decontamination chamber, through the heart-wrenching scenes in the infirmary, where each of his companions bid farewell, almost no stone was left unturned to show how much the feelings of those of us out in TV land were mirrored by those in the TV show. Though swathed in bandages, Michael Shanks delivered a sterling performance, while the frustration and tears from Teal'c (Christopher Judge), Carter (Amanda Tapping), and Frasier (Teryl Rothery) were not just for the camera. Next time you watch, look at how swollen their eyes are - they were bawling for hours for real.
The introduction of Jonas (Corin Nemec) was nicely understated and unless you'd been immersed in all the hype concerning the new arrival, you would have been hard pressed to see what all the fuss was about. He was as polished as any other charismatic guest and for my money added to rather than distracted from Jackson's poignant story. How fitting that Daniel should rush in to save the lives of Jonas and everyone else, knowing the consequences. A true hero, he wouldn't have thought to do anything else. How appropriate too, that Jack O'Neill (Richard Dean Anderson) would rush to Daniel's defence in defiance of all else.
Combining brilliant performances with the superlative photography, visual effects, music and all other facets that join to make a great show, Meridian must rate as one of the best-ever episodes of Stargate SG-1. Just two tiny gripes. Had Jack told Daniel he loved or even liked him during the bedside scene, there would have been cheers in millions of homes. Admiration just isn't enough when your bud is about to kick the bucket. And where was the physical contact when Daniel and Jack finally said 'Goodbye'? Even big, tough soldiers hug their mates. Still, the smile at the end of the next episode, Revelations, is well worth waiting for and has to be the best show of the series.



Edited By Mythor on May 25 2002 at 02:37